Capeless, in a declaration to WAMC, rejected that claim and cast question on Pucci’s credibility.
“Mr. Pucci is a disgruntled lawyer, whom represented someone who regrettably got taking part in a drunken event at Williams university, an alumna, ” Capeless told WAMC.
“We investigated it completely combined with the Williamstown Police Department and found that there clearly was not a foundation for moving forward with any situation, ” Capeless added. “That’s their problem. ”
Pucci’s client, known in this essay as Jane Doe, claims she ended up being raped on June 10, 2016, at her 25th reunion at Williams. Her title will be withheld by the Glass even though the DA’s workplace unveiled it to the reporter, unprompted, in a public records reaction.
The documents, connected here, usually do not retain the title for the victim or her so-called assailant. They do include troubling passages explaining the assault that is alleged.
Doe along with her spouse filed a study with Sgt. Scott McGowan regarding the Williamstown Police Department the following day and presented to McGowan two bits of physical proof: a rape kit administered by way of an intimate Assault Nurse Examiner (SANE) at Mt. Sinai Hospital and Doe’s clothes through the night for evaluation.
Papers acquired by the Greylock Glass suggest that the rape kit ended up being tested, yet not that DNA from so-called attacker ended up being gathered.
8 weeks later on, on August 30, Assistant District Attorney Gregory Barry through the Berkshire County District Attorney’s workplace told Pucci that any office had declined to follow costs after overview of the important points of this event. Continue reading “Berkshire DA management of intimate attack proof under fire”